Title: Predators of culture: Jaguar symbolism and Mesoamerican elites
, By: Saunders, Nicholas J., Graham-Campbell, James, World Archaeology,
00438243, Jun94, Vol. 26, Issue 1
Predators of culture: Jaguar symbolism and Mesoamerican
elites
Abstract
Jaguar imagery is one of the most frequently
encountered features of Pre-Columbian Mesoamerican symbolism. However,
despite its appearance in art and iconography over a period of some
three thousand years, most previous interpretations have tended to assert
rather than prove its significance. In this paper an attempt is made
to locate such imagery meaningfully in several categories of indigenous
thought. Thus, this approach seeks to show how such symbolism is entrenched
in Amerindian, Aztec and Maya conceptual systems, and how 'constructions'
of the jaguar in classification led to the emically logical use of its
verbal and artistic imagery in symbolic representations associated with
warfare, and the display of elite status.
Situating symbols
One of the most frequently encountered images in Mesoamerican art and
iconography is that which appears to show America's largest feline --
the jaguar (Panthera onca) -- in either naturalistic, stylized or anthropomorphic
form. Yet, despite the frequency of representation, in civilizations
spanning three thousand years, discussions of such imagery have often
been lacking in analytical precision. Most accounts have tended arbitrarily
to identify the animal, or its constituent parts, as jaguar, and then
to assert its symbolic significance. Arguably the most serious consequence
of this is that, hitherto, both formalist and analogical interpretations
of such imagery have regarded the jaguar's importance as a self-evident
'fact' (e.g. Bernal 1976: 66; Furst 1968: 148; Krickeberg et al. 1968:11)
rather than a graphic but speculative assumption.
Since art is one of the ways in which people
represent how they conceive of themselves, and their place in the world
(Roosevelt 1991: 89), the appearance and frequency of jaguar motifs,
as with any animal motifs, is not arbitrary, but is centred on the symbolic
systems which use the motifs metaphorically to express qualities regarded
as significant for a given society, and within particular contexts.
There is nothing obvious in the way in which a culture will regard a
particular animal, or in the way in which it may utilize the animal's
empirical behaviour or appearance in its symbolic reasoning (e.g. Douglas
1957; 1990; Lewis 1991), or image-making (e.g. Morphy 1989: 5). In this
sense, the jaguar symbol did not come ready-made, with a cluster of
inherently important attributes somehow ascribed to it by 'Nature'.
Rather, the jaguar, along with the natural world's diversity of culturally
defined animate beings and 'inanimate objects' (Levi-Strauss 1976: 184-5),
should be regarded as a cultural appraisal. It is argued here that it
is not from what we regard as empirical nature, but rather from an indigenously
'constructed nature' that animal symbols are taken, and from which they
derive their efficacy as signifiers of human activity.
Species are not natural kinds, but rather a product
of classification, as an ordering process which creates and sustains
the potential for metaphor use (Douglas 1990). As a society's ideas
about, and attitudes towards an animal are, at least in part, a product
of classification, then the constraints of emic logic will, presumably,
also circumscribe the use to which the image, symbol, or metaphor of
that animal can be put. What is needed in order to consider meaningfully
the jaguar symbol, like any symbol, is the identification of a local
emic theory which entrenched its use in patterns of social behaviour
and belief (ibid.: 27).
Image and imagination in Mesoamerican art
The physical and symbolic associations between large predatory cats,
warfare, and pre-eminent social status are particularly evident in Mesoamerica,
where images of felines, feline-like creatures, and humans with feline
attributes, apparel, or accoutrements, are found in a number of chronologically
and spatially separated cultures (e.g. Benson 1985; Coe 1972; Kubler
1972; Peterson 1990: 90-103; Saunders 1989). Whilst 'jaguar' imagery
has been a recurring theme in Mesoamerican iconography from the Preclassic
Olmec (c. 1250-400 BC) to the Postclassic Aztec (c. AD 1350-1521), assessing
its significance has been problematical.
In one sense, interpretational difficulties began
with assessments of Olmec art which identified what were assumed to
be jaguar or were-jaguar images in a variety of media, from delicately
carved jade items to monumental stonework and cave paintings (e.g. Coe
1968; 1972; Coe and Diehl 1980; Furst 1968; Grove 1984; Stirling 1943;
1955). Despite occasional more considered and sometimes contrary views
(e.g. Coe 1990; Furst 1981; Luckert 1976; Stocker et al. 1980), the
fascination of the Olmec 'feline complex', together with the outmoded
but enduring view of the Olmec as a 'mother culture' (Bernal 1976),
combined to produce a 'conceptual straitjacket' which constrained many
subsequent discussions. Such views were often clearly influenced by
a Eurocentric conception of the symbolic and ideological role of large
felines in Old World culture history (e.g. Coe 1972: 1, 11; see also,
Saunders 1992: 3-4, 220), and current Amerindian beliefs and practices
concerning hallucinogenic rituals and shamanic vision quests (e.g. Furst
1968; Harner 1978). These accounts ignored the fact that Pre-Columbian
'jaguar' imagery cannot be considered a logical or all-inclusive antecedent
to current Amerindian symbolism, still less a parallel to the attitudes
displayed by a diversity of European cultures towards lions, tigers,
or leopards.
This problem was compounded by an equally serious
issue -- that which dealt with the nature of representation. Many interpretations
seemed to assume that Pre-Columbian artists were concerned only or mainly
to represent the animal naturalistically, either in part or whole. Such
societies were evidently regarded as having been largely unaffected
by cultural, psychological or any other factors which may have intervened
to channel or influence their depictions (Ucko and Rosenfeld 1972; see
also, Layton 1977: 34). In other words, ancient Mesoamericans appeared
to subscribe to an eighteenth- and nineteenth-century European artistic
tradition of 'photographic reality' rather than to their own indigenous
stylistic canons.
Closely linked to this issue was the unfortunate
fact that hitherto feline imagery had often been labelled simply as
'jaguar', with little consistency or method in the terminology of such
assumed species-identifications. For example, the Aztec term for the
living jaguar, ocelotl, has been given in English as ocelot (e.g. Burland
1967: 90; Davies 1973: 143) or, even worse, as tiger (Vaillant 1944:
127). Further, Dibble and Anderson, in their translation of the sixteenth-century
Florentine Codex (Sahagun 1950-78), conflate two Aztec terms, ocelotl
(i.e. jaguar) and tlaco-ocelotl (i.e ocelot, Felis pardalis), thus using
one English term, ocelot, to refer to what, in the corresponding Nahuatl
text, are two clearly differentiated types of feline. The significance
of such an indiscriminate and confusing use of terms lies in the fact
that it obscured the emically logical process of classification by which
Pre-Columbian societies recognized and named particular species, invested
them with particular qualities, and used them to symbolize social values,
attitudes and behaviour.
A further complication was that these interpretational
difficulties were often nested within a wider debate on the appropriateness
of using sixteenth-century Late Postclassic ethnohistorical data to
interpret the iconography of earlier Preclassic and Classic period cultures.
Where some authors clearly favoured the 'unitary' view of Mesoamerican
civilization (Nicholson 1976: 169) -- where there is an assumed continuity
of iconographic and ideological symbolism spanning three thousand years
(e.g. Coe 1968: 111-15; Joralemon 1971; 1976) -- others urged caution,
warning of the dangers of 'disjunctive situations', where form and meaning
may have become realigned over time (Kubler 1967: 11; 1970). By relying
on superficial resemblances of form to indicate resemblance of meaning,
without any understanding as to how or why 'regularities' were generated,
many previous interpretations have failed to consider that, even where
there is historical continuity, this does not guarantee similarity of
prehistoric, historical, or ethnographic 'cultural expressions' (Wylie
1985: 74-5).
Previous interpretations of so-called jaguar
symbolism have, by and large, been evocative rather than compelling.
Part of the underlying problem seems to have been that one-off, all-embracing
explanations have been uncritically applied to a diversity of cultures,
ignoring the fact that form, content and style of representation can
differ within and between societies, and for a variety of ecological,
psychological, cultural and utilitarian reasons (Ucko 1988: xi).
And yet, there is evidence from many parts of
Mesoamerica that the jaguar appears to have been conceived in such a
way that its meaning (i.e. the combination of qualities which it signified)
was embedded in language and belief, as well as art. Whatever it was
that the jaguar represented, it was apparently important enough to have
been appropriated symbolically by the elites of at least two major Pre-Columbian
civilizations -- the Aztec and Maya. In addition, these two civilizations
appear to have thought about, 'constructed' and used jaguar imagery
in broadly similar ways, and in certain analogous contexts, to recent
Amerindian societies in both Central and South America. It is possible,
therefore, to employ an analogical approach in assessing jaguar imagery,
and perhaps to suggest a limited degree of convergence between ethnographic,
ethnohistoric and archaeological data. By utilizing a deliberately restricted,
as opposed to an all-inclusive, range of ethnographic materials, this
paper aims to show how jaguar symbolism was entrenched in Aztec and
Maya conceptual thought and anchored firmly in meaningful patterns of
symbolic activity.
Locating meaning in the ethnographic dimension
Given the inadequacy of previous approaches, and archaeology's inability
to provide conclusive answers unaided, the wealth of ethnohistoric and
ethnographic data on jaguar imagery clearly comes into its own. This
view is strengthened by an apparent unity of feline, and particularly
large spotted-cat symbolism, in the ethnographic and archaeological
records of Central and South America over a period of some three thousand
years (Benson 1972; Saunders 1989; 1992: 224). However, in order to
avoid previous pitfalls, analogical reasoning as employed here is not
based on the assumption that human behaviour is generically uniform,
or that any contemporary society will replicate the exact association
of attributes distinctive of a prehistoric culture. It is acknowledged
that analogy is an inductive, probabilistic argument which suggests
but a partial similarity, never a complete identity (Wylie 1982: 392-3).
It is further recognized that 'similarity' itself is a culturally relative
notion. Nevertheless, it is apparent that a careful consideration of
ethnographic contexts widens our interpretive horizons by suggesting
generative principles and generalizations that can be tested against
archaeological data (Stark 1993: 95). This process, I will argue, offers
potentially useful insights into the architecture of ancient Mesoamerican
conceptual thought.
In Central and South America, ethnographic data
reveal a close symbolic relationship between the jaguar, social status,
warfare, and the wielding of spiritual and political power by shamans
and chiefs (e.g. Furst 1968; Reichel-Dolmatoff 1975; Roe, forthcoming;
Saunders 1992: 50-81). This contextual specificity indicates that jaguar
imagery in dress and accoutrements was associated with aggression (e.g.
Furst 1968: 152-3; Levi-Strauss 1948: 365), the qualities of strength
and fierceness (e.g. Goldman 1979: 225; Karsten 1968: 124), supernatural
protection (Karsten 1968: 123), and pre-eminent social status (e.g.
Goldman 1979: 57). Jaguar killing, in particular, was a route to gaining
and maintaining social prestige (e.g. Metraux 1946: 417; 1948: 412),
and local terms for the jaguar were incorporated into the names and
titles of priests, chiefs, deities and ancestors (Reichel-Dolmatoff
1975: 45).
The greatest density of jaguar symbolism however,
appears in association with the shaman (e.g. Furst 1968; Goldman 1979:
262; Reichel-Dolmatoff 1975) -- a fact which has led to some of the
interpretational problems mentioned above. The varied aspects of this
relationship are well illustrated by the imagery invoked by Guahibo
shamans
[who] still wear headresses of jaguar claws turned
upwards, necklaces of jaguar teeth, and carry bags of jaguar fur that
contain herbs, stones, and their snuffing equipment. The narcotic powder
is kept in a tubular jaguar bone. ... An officiating Guahibo shaman
paints his face with black spots in imitation of jaguar pelt marks,
a form of facial paint that is only used by shamans.
(Reichel-Dolmatoff 1975: 46)
For Amerindian societies, a fundamental equivalence
between the jaguar, shamans, warriors and hunters is reflected in etymology,
inasmuch as local terms for the jaguar not only acknowledge its status
as the pre-eminent predator (e.g. Arhem 1981:203), but can also denote
predator status in extenso. This conceptual extension of the jaguar/predator
category is based, for example in north-west Amazonia, on the belief
that any animal or human which hunts any other can be referred to as
yai (Hugh-Jones 1979: 124; Elizabeth Reichel, pers. comm.), though typically
it refers to the jaguar and powerful shamans (1979: 124). Embedded in
classification, the designation 'jaguar' signifies human attributes
ascribed to the culturally constructed animal in distinctive configurations.
In the ethnographic context, jaguar imagery represents
less a depiction or description of the living animal per se, than of
a 'bundle' of negotiated meanings appropriate to the representation
of certain culturally important qualities (Morphy 1989:5). From the
evidence presented above, these meanings appear to have been acknowledged
in local theories of the world within which the use of jaguar symbolism
was apparently associated with notions of strength, aggression and pre-eminent
status. The conceptual correlation between these notions and the relevant
contexts of hunting, warfare, shamanistic ritual (i.e. spirit-attack
and defence), and general status display, illustrates the degree to
which jaguar symbols and metaphors were embedded in indigenous thought
and action. In the light of this ethnographic evidence it is possible
to consider the meaning and significance of such imagery in Aztec and
Maya symbolic thought. By assessing how these two civilizations conceived
of the jaguar, and in what contexts its symbolism was concentrated,
it may be possible to throw some light on the indigenous logic which
made the animal such an apparently suitable vehicle for the metaphorical
expression of elite display.
The Aztec
In the Florentine Codex (Sahagun 1950-82), we find the jaguar referred
to as ocelotl and regarded as the 'bravest' and 'fiercest' of animals,
whose 'cautious', 'wise' and 'proud' disposition made it the 'ruler
of the animal world' (ibid., Book 11: 1). This view suggests that the
Aztecs conceived of the ocelotl as the embodiment of a distinctive configuration
of human qualities, and that its imagery was appropriate to signify
this 'bundle' of ascribed attributes in certain contexts. We subsequently
find ocelotl symbolism associated with warriors, dignitaries and rulers
-- the Aztec elite - for whom the classificatory attributes ascribed
to the ocelotl were recognized as definitive qualities.
Especially brave warriors, for example, could
become members of one of two elite military orders, the ocelotl warrior
society and the cuauhtli (i.e. eagle) warrior society, and were then
privileged to wear the appropriate costumes. Anawalt (1992) refers to
the design of the ocelotl warrior's costume as connecting the wearer
to the power and protection of the jaguar. Even the coincidences of
birth-dates were significant, as those individuals born under the sign
of the month called ocelotl were regarded as possessing the attributes
signified by the jaguar (Duran 1971: 402), and thus were particularly
suitable to lead a warrior's life. The degree to which this aggressive
aspect of jaguar symbolism was embedded in Aztec thought is shown by
terms with ocelotl as their root, which were applied adjectivally to
individuals who displayed the appropriate qualities. Thus the terms
ocelopetlatl and oceloyotl were considered particularly appropriate
to describe valiant warriors, and the qualities of valour and bravery
in general (Simeon 1988: 352).
A similar concentration of ocelotl symbolism
is found in association with Aztec royalty, particularly in clothing
and paraphernalia. According to Sahagun (1950-82, Book 8: 23-5, 8),
Aztec emperors adorned themselves with ocelotl capes, breech clouts,
and sandals made of the animal's pelt. Emperors also wore an insignia
of ocelotl skin into battle (Simeon 1988: 352). This symbolic association
is also evident in royalty's privileged access to the use of a variety
of ocelotl-skin thrones, mats and cushions (Sahagun 1950-82, Book 8:
31) (Fig. 1), as an expression of authority and rulership (Dibble 1971:
324).
There was also a religious and ideological manifestation
of ocelotl symbolism in the omniscient and omnipotent supreme Aztec
deity Tezcatlipoca (Nicholson 1971: 412; Saunders 1990; 1992: 127-44).
This god was the patron of royalty and played a central role in rituals
of royal accession (Townsend 1987). The most convincing of Tezcatlipoca's
many ocelotl associations was his transformational manifestation as
the jaguar Tepeyollotli (Jimenez Moreno 1979: 28; Saunders, in press),
who, in a number of codices, is shown either as a jaguar (e.g. Codex
Borbonicus, Seler 1904: fig. 28a) (Fig. 2), or in association with jaguar
imagery (e.g. Codex Borgia, Morante 1991:32). This symbolism was reinforced
in Aztec cosmology and mythology, where Caso (1958: 14-15) relates how
Tezcatlipoca was a nocturnal deity whose alter ego was the jaguar and,
as such, was also the patron of Aztec sorcerers, who used the animal's
claws, pelt, and heart in their magical activities (Sahagun 1950-82,
Book 11: 3).
The Maya
In the various Maya languages the jaguar is called balam or bolom (Alvarez
1984: 328; Laughlin 1975: 84-5; Hunn 1977: 233). In the Colonial Period
Yucatec Maya language, the balam was regarded as 'brave' and the etymologically-related
term, boolay, signified 'savage', 'fierce' -- and thus, presumably,
jaguar-like behaviour, in all animals that killed others (Alvarez 1984:
328). The Yucatec Maya phrase, balam-tah, translates, suggestively,
as either 'to be like a jaguar' or 'to hunt like a jaguar' (ibid.: 329),
and Thompson (1970: 291) notes also that the term balam was used as
a symbol of strength, fierceness and valour. Thus, for the Maya, as
for the Aztec, the jaguar appears to have signified predator status,
and to have represented a cluster of highly specific human qualities.
In the light of this, we might expect to find a conceptual extension
of balam symbolism from the realm of animals to that of humans -- in
other words to be associated with warriors and the elite of Maya society.
Consonant with this view, Laughlin (1975: 84),
Pitt-Rivers (1970: 189), and Gossen (1975: 452) note that, amongst the
more recent Maya, individuals with a strong and aggressive nature were
considered as possessing a balam as an animal soul-companion, or nagual.
Recent advances in Maya hieroglyphic decipherment appear to extend this
association back into the Classic Maya period (Houston and Stuart 1989:
6). In Postclassic Maya society, not only were there balam warrior societies
who wore balam insignia, apparel and accoutrements into battle (Landa
1982: 52; Orellana 1984: 60), but the whole concept of warfare is referred
to in a Yucatec Maya phrase which translates as 'spreading the jaguar
skin' (Roys 1967: 154). Similarly, in Classic Maya iconography, there
is a close physical and symbolic association between jaguar imagery,
warriors, and warfare. Specifically, Freidel (1986: 99-101) notes that
the scroll-topped jaguar motif is a primary image of war, as it appears
in the battle scenes of the Bonampak murals (see also, Miller 1986:
98, 107-8), is a prominent feature of war regalia in narrative scenes
at Yaxchilan, and is physically associated with glyphic references to
war, captives and sacrifice on many lowland Maya monuments.
Ethnohistoric evidence indicates that jaguar
imagery was also associated with preeminent social status -- specifically
with strong, powerful and leading members of society. The term balam,
as well as certain of the living animal's physical attributes, appears
to have signified lordship (e.g. Edmonson 1971: 148, 218). In the Popol
Vuh of the Quiche Maya, the term balam referred to magical power and
was used as an epithet, almost a title, signifying the qualities of
strength and might (ibid.: 148). According to Thompson (1970), balam
not only means jaguar, but also designated rulers and priests (see also,
Edmonson 1984: 93). These associations are apparent also in Classic
Maya iconography, where elite individuals wear what appears to be jaguar
clothing, accoutrements and paraphernalia (e.g. Benson 1985; Robicsek
1975: 108-11) (Fig. 3), the remains of which have been found in elite
mortuary contexts (e.g. Kidder, Jennings and Shook 1946: 155; Pendergast
1969: 21; Smith 1950: 90, Welsh, pers. comm.). A further association
between rulers and balam imagery in the Classic period is found in the
many depictions of jaguar-shaped thrones or cushions of jaguar-skin
(Robicsek 1975: 108-18) -- an association paralleled during early Colonial
times, when the phrase ix-pop-balam meant the 'jaguar mat', the seat
of authority in a Maya council (Roys 1967: 66).
Conclusions
For both the Aztec and Maya, it appears that whilst Panthera onca was
the empirical prototype, the culturally 'constructed' jaguar was the
conceptual paragon. The latter, with its freight of cultural meanings,
served as a source of appropriate metaphor to express a relational analogy
consistent with the ascribed attributes of the animal in classification.
To 'be jaguar', therefore, was to act in accordance with the distinctive,
culture-specific configuration of human qualities which the jaguar signified.
Consequently, representations of jaguars, either naturalistic or stylized,
cannot be taken simply as denoting the animal but also as connoting
a variety of other meanings (Tilley 1991: 44).
Whereas previous attempts to analyse jaguar symbolism
in Mesoamerica have often assumed that it was self-evident that Pre-Columbian
peoples would worship 'jaguar gods' (Krickeberg et al. 1968: 11), and
that the jaguar was an obvious emblem for hierarchical, sophisticated
civilizations because it was such an 'essential animal' (Bernal 1976:
66), I have argued that such views represent an unwarranted assimilation
of the past to the present. I have also argued that it is possible to
locate the meaning of such imagery more securely in contexts of indigenous
thought and action. Whilst I do not suggest that this provides a definitive
resolution to the problems raised by the analysis of such symbolism,
it may have gone some way to establishing what Douglas (1990: 28) has
called a 'theory of behaviour' rather than a correlation of superficial
resemblances.
More specifically, amongst the Aztec, Maya and
more recent Amerindian societies, conceptions of the jaguar, linguistic
terms referring to human qualities which the animal signified, and the
context-specific uses of its imagery, have been shown to exhibit a degree
of similar patterning, in terms of warfare and status display. As the
use of jaguar imagery appears to have been internally consistent for
each society, and as warfare and status-related situations displayed
the greatest density of such imagery, it can be suggested for these
designated contexts that the enduring form of symbolism possessed, at
least in part, an enduring similarity of culturally ascribed meaning
and associated cultural behaviour. In the light of this, the analogy
between the ethnographic source and the archaeological subjects can
be regarded as having thrown further light on the meaningful uses of
jaguar imagery by the elites of two of Pre-Columbian Mesoamerica's major
civilizations, and may serve as a starting point for more thoughtful
considerations of similar imagery in other Mesoamerican cultures.
8.x.93
PHOTO (BLACK & WHITE): Figure 1 The jaguar-skin
throne of the Aztec emperor Acamapichtli (from Codex Tovar).
PHOTO (BLACK & WHITE): Figure 2 Tepeyollotli,
the jaguar manifestation of Tezcatlipoca -- the omniscient suppreme
Aztec deity (from Codex Borbonicus; after Seler 1904).
PHOTO (BLACK & WHITE): Figure 3 A Classic
Maya ruler from Temple III, Tikal, Guatemala. The figure is wearing
a huge jaguar-head helmet and an elaborate jaguar-skin costume, complete
even to the tail (after W. R. Coe, Tikal Project).
References
Alvarez, C. 1984. Diccionario etnolinguistico del idioma Maya Yucateco
Colonial. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.
Anawalt, P. R. 1992. A comparative analysis of
the costumes and accoutrements of the Codex Mendoza. In The Codex Mendoza
(eds F. Berdan and P. R. Anawalt), Vol. I. Los Angeles: University of
California Press, pp. 103-50.
Arhem, K. 1981. Makuna Social Organization. Uppsala:
Uppsala Studies in Cultural Anthropology 4; Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
Benson, E. P. (ed.) 1972. The Cult of the Feline.
Washington: Dumbarton Oaks.
Benson, E. P. 1974. A Man and a Feline in Mochica
Art. Washington: Studies in Pre-Columbian Art and Archaeology 14, Dumbarton
Oaks.
Benson, E. P. 1985. The Classic Maya use of jaguar
accessories. In Fourth Palenque Round Table VI (ed. E. P. Benson). San
Francisco: Pre-Columbian Art Institute, pp. 155-8.
Bernal, I. 1976. The Olmec World. Berkeley: University
of California Press.
Burland, C. 1967. The Gods of Mexico. London:
Eyre & Spottiswoode.
Caso, A. 1958. The Aztecs: People of the Sun.
Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Coe, M. D. 1968. America's First Civilization:
Discovering the Olmec. New York: Van Nostrand.
Coe, M. D. 1972. Olmec jaguars and Olmec kings.
In The Cult of the Feline (ed. E. P. Benson). Washington: Dumbarton
Oaks, pp. 1-18.
Coe, M. D. 1990. The Olmec heartland: evolution
of ideology. In Regional Perspectives on the Olmec (eds R. J. Sharer
and D. C. Grove). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 68-84.
Coe, M. D. and Diehl, R. 1980. In the Land of
the Olmec. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Davies, N. 1973. The Aztecs. London: Macmillan.
Dibble, C. E. 1971. Writing in Central Mexico.
In Handbook of Middle American Indians Vol. 10, part 1 (ed. R. Wauchope).
Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 322-32.
Douglas, M. 1957. Animals in Lele religious symbolism.
Africa, 27: 46-58.
Douglas, M. 1990. The pangolin revisited: a new
approach to animal symbolism. In Signifying Animals: Human Meaning in
the Natural World (ed. R. G. Willis). London: Unwin Hyman, pp. 25-36.
Duran, F. D. de. 1971. Book of the Gods and Rites
and the Ancient Calendar (trans. D. Heyden and F. Horcasitas). Norman:
University of Oklahoma Press.
Edmonson, M. S. 1971. The Book of Counsel: The
Popol Vuh of the Quiche Maya of Guatemala. New Orleans: Publication
35, Middle American Research Institute, Tulane University.
Edmonson, M. S. 1984. Human sacrifice in the
Books of Chilam Balam of Tizimin and Chumayel. In Ritual Human Sacrifice
in Mesoamerica (eds E. P. Benson and E. H. Boone). Washington: Dumbarton
Oaks, pp. 91-100.
Freidel, D. A. 1986. Maya warfare: an example
of peer polity interaction. In Peer Polity Interaction and Socio-Political
Change (eds C. Renfrew and J. Cherry). Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, pp. 93-116.
Furst, P. T. 1968. The Olmec were-jaguar motif
in the light of ethnographic reality. In Conference on the Olmec (ed.
E. P. Benson). Washington: Dumbarton Oaks, pp. 143-75.
Furst, P. T. 1981. Jaguar baby or toad mother:
a new look at an old problem in Olmec iconography. In The Olmec and
their Neighbours (ed. E. P. Benson). Washington: Dumbarton Oaks, pp.
149-62.
Goldman, I. 1979. The Cubeo. Urbana: University
of Illinois Press.
Gossen, G. H. 1975. Animals souls and human destiny
in Chamula. MAN, 10(3): 448-61.
Grove, D. 1984. Chalcatzingo. London: Thames
& Hudson.
Guggisberg, C. A. W. 1975. Wild Cats of the World.
Newton Abbot: David & Charles.
Harner, M. J. 1978. Hallucinogens and Shamanism.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Houston, S. and Stuart, D. 1989. The Way Glyph:
Evidence for 'Co-essences' among the Classic Maya. Washington: Research
Reports on Ancient Maya Writing 30, Center for Maya Research.
Hugh-Jones, S. 1979. The Palm and the Pleiades:
Initiation and Cosmology in Northwest Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Hunn, E. S. 1977. Tzeltal Folk Zoology: The Classification
of Discontinuities in Nature. London: Academic Press.
Jiminez Moreno, W. 1979. De Tezcatlipoca a Huitzilopochtli.
Actes du XLIIe Congrès International des Americanistes, 6: 27-34.
Joralemon, P. D. 1971. A Study of Olmec Iconography.
Washington: Studies in Pre-Columbian Art and Archaeology no. 7, Dumbarton
Oaks.
Joralemon, P. D. 1976. The Olmec dragon: a study
in Pre-Columbian iconography. In Origins of Religious Art and Iconography
in Preclassic Mesoamerica (ed. H. B. Nicholson). Los Angeles: UCLA Latin
American Center Publications, pp. 27-72.
Karsten, R. 1968. The Civilization of the South
American Indians. London: Dawsons of Pall Mall. Kidder, A. V., Jennings,
J. D. and Shook, E. M. 1946. Excavations at Kaminaljuyu, Guatemala.
Philadelphia: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Krickeberg, W. et al. 1968. Pre-Columbian American
Religions. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Kubler, G. 1967. The Iconography of the Art of
Teotihuacan. Washington: Studies in Pre-Columbian Art & Archaeology
4, Dumbarton Oaks.
Kubler, G. 1970. Period, style, and meaning in
ancient American art. New Literary History: A Journal of Theory and
Interpretation from the University of Virginia, 1-2: 127-44.
Kubler, G. 1972. Jaguars in the Valley of Mexico.
In The Cult of the Feline (ed. E. P. Benson). Washington: Dumbarton
Oaks, pp. 19-49.
Landa, D. de. 1982. Relacion de las Cosas de
Yucatan. Mexico City: Editorial Porrua.
Laughlin, R. M. 1975. The Great Tzotzil Dictionary
of San Lorenzo Zinacantan. Washington: Smithsonian Contributions to
Anthropology, No. 9, Smithsonian Institution Press.
Layton, R. 1977. Naturalism and cultural relativity
in art. In Form in Indigenous Art (ed. P. J. Ucko). London: Duckworth,
pp. 33-43.
Levi-Strauss, C. 1948. The Nambicuara. In Handbook
of South American Indians, Vol. 3 (ed. J. H. Steward). Washington: Smithsonian
Institution, pp. 361-70.
Levi-Strauss, C. 1976. The Savage Mind. London:
Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Lewis, I. M. 1991. The spider and the pangolin.
MAN, 26: 513-25.
Luckert, K. V. 1976. Olmec Religion: A Key to
Middle America and Beyond. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Metraux, A. 1946. Ethnography of the Chaco. In
Handbook of South American Indians, Vol. 1 (ed. J. H. Steward). Washington:
Smithsonian Institution, pp. 197-370.
Metraux, A. 1948. Tribes of Eastern Bolivia and
Madeira Headwaters. In Handbook of South American Indians, Vol. 3 (ed.
J. H. Steward). Washington: Smithsonian Institution, pp. 381-454.
Miller, M. E. 1986. The Bonampak Murals. New
York: Princeton University Press.
Morante, R. 1991. Tezcatlipoca: El Dios de todo
lugar. Mexico desconocido, XIV(171): 30-2.
Morphy, H. 1989. Introduction. In Animals into
Art (ed. H. Morphy). London: Unwin Hyman, pp. 1-17.
Nicholson, H. B. 1971. Religion in Pre-Hispanic
Central Mexico. In Handbook of Middle American Indians, Vol. 10. Archaeology
of Northern Mesoamerica, Vol. 1 (eds G. Eckholm and I. Bernal). Austin:
University of Texas Press, pp. 395-445.
Nicholson, H. B. 1976. Preclassic Mesoamerican
iconography from the perspective of the Postclassic: problems in interpretational
analysis. In Origins of Religious Art & Iconography in Preclassic
Mesoamerica (ed. H. B. Nicholson). Los Angeles: UCLA Latin American
Center Publications, pp. 157-76.
Orellana, S. 1984. The Tzutujil Mayas. Norman:
University of Oklahoma Press. Pendergast, D. M. 1969. Altun Ha, British
Honduras (Belize): The Sun God's Tomb. Toronto: Royal Ontario Museum,
Art & Archaeology Occasional Paper 19.
Peterson, J. F. 1990. Precolumbian Flora and
Fauna. San Diego: Mingei International Museum Exhibition Documentary
Publication.
Pitt-Rivers, J. 1970. Spiritual power in Central
America: the Naguals of Chiapas. In Witchcraft Confessions and Accusations
(ed. M. Douglas). London: Tavistock Publications, pp. 183-206.
Reichel-Dolmatoff, G. 1975. The Shaman and the
Jaguar: A Study of Narcotic Drugs among the Indians of Colombia. Philadelphia:
Temple University Press.
Robicsek, F. 1975. A Study in Maya Art and History:
The Mat Symbol. New York: Museum of the American Indian, Heye Foundation.
Roe, P. G. Forthcoming. More than human: the
jaguar as paragon and peril in lowland Amerindian symbolism. In Icons
of Power: Feline Symbolism in the Americas (ed. N. J. Saunders). In
preparation.
Roosevelt, A. C. 1991. Moundbuilders of the Amazon.
London: Academic Press.
Roys, R. L. 1967. The Book of Chilam Balam of
Chumayel. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Sahagun, B. de. 1950-82. Florentine Codex: General
History of the Things of New Spain (trans. and eds by A. J. O. Anderson
and C. E. Dibble). Santa Fe: The School of American Research and the
University of Utah. 13 vols.
Saunders, N. J. 1989. People of the Jaguar. London:
Souvenir Press.
Saunders, N. J. 1990. Tezcatlipoca: jaguar metaphors
and the Aztec Mirror of Nature. In Signifying Animals: Human Meaning
in the Natural World (ed. R. G. Willis). London: Unwin Hyman, pp. 159-77.
Saunders, N. J. 1992. The jaguars of culture:
symbolizing humanity in Pre-Columbian and Amerindian societies. Doctoral
dissertation. Department of Archaeology, University of Southampton.
Saunders, N. J. In Press. At the mouth of the
Obsidian Cave: deity and place in Aztec religion. In Sacred Sites, Sacred
Places (eds D. L. Carmichael, J. Hubert, B. Reeves and O. Schanche).
London: Routledge.
Seler, E. 1904. Ueber Steinkisten, Tepetlacalli,
mit Opferdarstellungen und andere ahnliche Monumente. Gesammelte Abhandlungen
zur Amerikanischen Sprach- und Altertumskunde, 2: 717-66.
Simeon, R. 1988. Diccionario de la lengua Nahuatl
o Mexicano. Mexico City: Siglo Veintiuno.
Smith, A. L. 1950. Uaxactun, Guatemala: Excavations
of 1931-1937. Washington: Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication
588.
Stark, M. T. 1993. Re-fitting the 'cracked and
broken facade': the case for empiricism in post-processual ethnoarchaeology.
In Archaeological Theory: Who sets the Agenda? (eds N. Yoffee and A.
Sherratt). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 93-104.
Stirling, M. 1943. La Venta's green stone tigers.
National Geographic, 84: 321-32.
Stirling, M. 1955. Stone Monuments of the Rio
Chiquito, Veracruz, Mexico. Washington: Smithsonian Institution, Bureau
of American Ethnology Bulletin 157, pp. 1-24.
Stocker, T. et al. 1980. Crocodilians and Olmecs:
further interpretations in Formative period iconography. American Antiquity,
45: 740-58.
Thompson, J. E. S. 1970. Maya History and Religion.
Norman: University of Oklahoma Press. Tilley, C. 1991. Material Culture
and Text: The Art of Ambiguity. London: Routledge.
Townsend, R. F. 1987. Coronation at Tenochtitlan.
In The Aztec Templo Mayor (ed. E. H. Boone). Washington: Dumbarton Oaks,
pp. 371-410.
Ucko, P. J. 1988. Foreword. In What is an Animal?
(ed. T. Ingold). London: Unwin Hyman, pp. ix-xii.
Ucko, P. J. and Rosenfeld, A. 1972. Anthropomorphic
Representations in Palaeolithic Art. Santander: Separata de Actas del
Simposio Internacional de Arte Rupestre.
Vaillant, G. 1944. The Aztecs of Mexico. New
York: Doubleday.
Wylie, A. 1982. An analogy by any other name
is just as analogical. In Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1 (4):
382-401.
Wylie, A. 1985. The reaction against analogy.
In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 8 (ed. M. B. Schiffer).
London: Academic Press, pp. 63-111.
Wylie, A. 1989. Matters of fact and matters of
interest. In Archaeological Approaches to Cultural Identity (ed. S.
Shennan). London: Unwin Hyman, pp. 94-109.
~~~~~~~~
By Nicholas J. Saunders, Department of History,
University of the West Indies, Jamaica
|
War Club - Riotstage
Hear more War Cub music @
Mexica
Uprising MySpace
Add Mexica Uprising
to your
friends list to get updates, news,
enter contests, and get free revolutionary contraband.
Featured Link:
Academia Semillas del Pueblo
"If Brown (vs. Board
of Education) was just about letting Black people into a White
school, well we don’t care about that anymore. We don’t
necessarily want to go to White schools. What we want to do is
teach ourselves, teach our children the way we have of teaching.
We don’t want to drink from a White water fountain...We
don’t need a White water fountain. So the whole issue of
segregation and the whole issue of the Civil Rights Movement is
all within the box of White culture and White supremacy. We should
not still be fighting for what they have. We are not interested
in what they have because we have so much more and because the
world is so much larger. And ultimately the White way, the American
way, the neo liberal, capitalist way of life will eventually lead
to our own destruction. And so it isn’t about an argument
of joining neo liberalism, it’s about us being able, as
human beings, to surpass the barrier."
- Marcos Aguilar
(Principal, Academia Semillas del Pueblo)
Grow
a Mexica Garden
12/31/06
The
Aztecs: Their History,
Manners, and Customs by:
Lucien Biart
12/29/06
6 New Music Videos
Including
Dead Prez, Quinto Sol,
and Warclub
12/29/06
Kalpulli
"Mixcoatl" mp3 album
download Now Available
for Purchase
9/12/06
Che/Marcos/Zapata
T-shirt
Now Available for Purchase
7/31/06
M-1
"Til We Get There"
Music Video
7/31/06
Native
Guns "Champion"
Live Video
7/31/06
Sub-Comandante
Marcos
T-shirt Now Available for Purchase
7/26/06
11 New Music Videos Including
Dead Prez, Native Guns,
El Vuh, and Olmeca
7/10/06
Howard Zinn's
A People's
History of the United States
7/02/06
The
Tamil Tigers
7/02/06
The Sandinista
Revolution
6/26/06
The Cuban
Revolution
6/26/06
Che Guevara/Emiliano
Zapata
T-shirts Now in Stock
6/25/06
Free Online Books
4/01/06
"Decolonize"
and "Sub-verses"
from Aztlan Underground
Now Available for Purchase
4/01/06
Zapatista
"Ya Basta" T-shirt
Now Available for Purchase
3/19/06
An
Analytical Dictionary
of Nahuatl by Frances
Kartutten Download
3/19/06
Tattoo
Designs
2/8/06
|